{"id":2108,"date":"2008-09-28T08:16:00","date_gmt":"2008-09-28T06:16:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.stylediary.ro\/wordpress\/?p=2108"},"modified":"2009-02-11T15:19:44","modified_gmt":"2009-02-11T13:19:44","slug":"matricea-toamnei","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.stylediary.ro\/wordpress\/2008\/09\/28\/matricea-toamnei\/","title":{"rendered":"Matricea toamnei"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Va sunt cunoscute, nu-i asa, cadranele tip analiza SWOT, urgent\/ important\/ non-urgent\/ non-important, samd?\u00a0 Pe Wall Street Journal am gasit un grafic asemanator, care sumarizeaza principalele tendinte si colectii ale toamnei 2008.\u00a0 Dupa o trecere in revista a colectiilor de la New York, Londra, Paris si Milano, cei de la WSJ si-au dat seama ca respectivele prezentari au un spectru foarte larg: de la lookuri intunecate dar foarte bine desenate (care, spun ei, reflecta climatul economic), pana la piese pline de verva si creativitate. Unii designeri au facut haine pentru esalonul de business si varful ierarhiei, altii pentru covorul rosu sau o estetica avangardista.<\/p>\n<p>WSJ a impartit ecranul in 4 cadrane, dupa cum urmeaza: Fashionable vs. Questionable, Work vs. Play. De fapt, matricea trebuie citita de la stanga la dreapta, si pe orizontala (Fashionable Play\/ Fashionable Work), si pe verticala (Fashionable Play\/ Questionable\/ Play)<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.stylediary.ro\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/09\/matrice.JPG\" title=\"Matricea toamnei 2008\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/www.stylediary.ro\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/09\/matrice.JPG\" title=\"Matricea toamnei 2008\" alt=\"Matricea toamnei 2008\" width=\"480\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Concluzii:<\/p>\n<p>Marni, Burberry Prorsum, Vera Wang, Yves Saint Laurent, Lanvin, Jil Sander, Chanel sunt Fashionable for Work. Prada, Rodarte sunt Fashionable for Work &amp; Play;<\/p>\n<p>Alexander McQueen, Christian Lacroix, Comme des Garcons, Jean Paul Gaultier sunt Fashionable for Play.<\/p>\n<p>Giles, Yohji Yamamoto, Maison Martin Margiela sunt in zona de Questionable for Work &amp; Play (especially for Work deocamdata, daca ma intrebati pe mine)<\/p>\n<p>Christian Dior, Givenchy, Calvin Klein sunt Questionable for Work (nu sunt de acord cu CK in aceasta categorie).<\/p>\n<p>Personal, colectiile reprezentative pentru cadranele superioare (Work\/ Play Fashionable) mi se par bine gasite, desi as fi pus Balenciaga catre zona de Play. As fi adaugat aici, la Work, Bottega Veneta, Diane von Furstenberg, BCBG Max Azria, Michael Kors, Yigal Azrouel si Halston.\u00a0 In cadranul de Fashionable\/ Play as fi introdus D&amp;G, Balmain, McCartney, Marchesa si Valentino, iar la Questionable &#8211; Rick Owens, Junya Watanabe, Gareth Pugh. Voi ce parere aveti? Ce ati adauga?<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.stylediary.ro\/wordpress\/?attachment_id=2110\" rel=\"attachment wp-att-2110\" title=\"matrice1.JPG\"><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Va sunt cunoscute, nu-i asa, cadranele tip analiza SWOT, urgent\/ important\/ non-urgent\/ non-important, samd?\u00a0 Pe Wall Street Journal am gasit un grafic asemanator, care sumarizeaza principalele tendinte si colectii ale toamnei 2008.\u00a0 Dupa o trecere in revista a colectiilor de la New York, Londra, Paris si Milano, cei de la WSJ si-au dat seama ca [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[23],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2108","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-remarks-observations"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.stylediary.ro\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2108","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.stylediary.ro\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.stylediary.ro\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.stylediary.ro\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.stylediary.ro\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2108"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.stylediary.ro\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2108\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.stylediary.ro\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2108"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.stylediary.ro\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2108"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.stylediary.ro\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2108"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}